> Now I could update to Synology 7 but don�t want to brak anything.
> auto-update of PERL is deactivated already.
> Are there any known issues with the combination LMS and Synology 7? I
> don�t want to go with a container or anything like that but just want it
> to run natively.
I believe you'd be much better off re-considering your stance wrt.
Docker. Sticking with an aging system almost never is a good idea.
You'll be running a growing stack of outdated and potentially
increasingly vulnerable software. Not even the beloved LMS (the reason
why we're discussing here) could be updated. It's a dead end.
Bite the bullet and get Docker up and running. Once set up updates won't
be any harder than updating the "native" package was.
Or get a Pi to run LMS on.
But don't run a NAS with outdated software because of an LMS you
couldn't update either. It's a bad choice and can really hurt in the
longer term.
> auto-update of PERL is deactivated already.
> Are there any known issues with the combination LMS and Synology 7? I
> don�t want to go with a container or anything like that but just want it
> to run natively.
I believe you'd be much better off re-considering your stance wrt.
Docker. Sticking with an aging system almost never is a good idea.
You'll be running a growing stack of outdated and potentially
increasingly vulnerable software. Not even the beloved LMS (the reason
why we're discussing here) could be updated. It's a dead end.
Bite the bullet and get Docker up and running. Once set up updates won't
be any harder than updating the "native" package was.
Or get a Pi to run LMS on.
But don't run a NAS with outdated software because of an LMS you
couldn't update either. It's a bad choice and can really hurt in the
longer term.